Is helping Ukraine worth risking WW3?
Last Updated: 23.06.2025 00:06
Russia can stop this any time.
Ukrainians are so tired of hearing all this nonsense.
Sending F16s to Ukraine is WW3.
Letting Ukraine strike Russia with their home-made weapons is WW3.
Please kindly ask Mr Putin to avoid the WW3.
Letting Ukraine fire ATACMS at Russian air bases is patently conclusively unequivocally WW3.
Ukraine refusing to surrender to Russia in February 2022 is WW3.
“It’s going to be WW3!” is the most notorious notion used by fear-mongers for years.
Ukraine’s getting invitation to NATO is WW3?
How do I promote my book to get it reviewed and grow an audience if I already published it?
Ukraine getting Javelins is WW3.
Thank you.
What’s next?
Why is my elder sister so mean?
Ukraine’s incursion into Russia is undeniably WW3.
Sending ATACMS is WW3.
Ukraine kicking Russia out of Ukraine is WW3?
Harvard gastroenterologist shares 4 bloat-busting tricks that actually work - Times of India
Sending weapons to Ukraine is certainly WW3.
All they have to do is to withdraw their troops.
Trump approving to kill Soleimani is WW3.
Street Dog Who Fought to Survive by Eating Rocks and Dirt Has Us in Tears - PetHelpful
Sending Abrams tanks is absolutely WW3.
Any day of the week — including Sundays.
Let’s just make it real clear:
EchoStar Soars 49% As Trump Urges FCC To Settle Dispute - Investor's Business Daily
Supplying Ukraine with Tomahawks is WW3? Stationing western troops in Odesa is WW3?
Sending Stormshadow/Scalp missiles is WW3.
Sending MANPADS/ATGMs to Ukraine is undoubtedly WW3.
Powerful solar telescope unveils ultra-fine magnetic 'curtains' on the sun's surface - Space
Sending HIMARS is surely WW3.
Just in the last 5 years:
Letting Ukraine strike targets in Crimea is WW3.